Same token. Different cost layers.

Which fee are you looking at?

Pump.fun’s published bonding-curve total is 1.25%. That is a specific route, not a universal price for every token or every Pump.fun mobile trade. Graduated canonical PumpSwap pools have a market-cap-dependent schedule, and other pool routes have different fees.

A Fomo trade routed through a third-party protocol can still incur that protocol’s fee. Adding an interface does not automatically remove the underlying charge. You need the actual route and quote to compare totals.

The mobile app can introduce another layer

Pump.fun’s fee page notes that some mobile transactions may have an additional fee of up to 0.1%. Whether it applies depends on the route and context. Do not add it universally, and do not assume it is included in every quoted headline.

A token’s presence on a public market-data site does not prove it is available in Fomo. Check the actual token and route in the application. Aftercost does not maintain a verified Fomo token-availability database.

What a useful comparison needs

Our calculator models Fomo’s ordinary Solana interface fee. Add known third-party costs yourself. It does not fetch Pump.fun routes, predict execution, or label a route cheaper without the full cost information.

• The same token contract, network and trade size.
• Its current route: bonding curve, graduated pool or another pool.
• Separate interface, protocol, creator or liquidity-provider charges where disclosed.
• Final expected token quantity on a buy, and net proceeds on a sale.

Use the tool for the part we can verify

The published Fomo fee table is useful for understanding the app’s contribution to cost. The Pump.fun fee page explains a separate layer. Keep both visible, and compare actual order quotes before choosing where to trade.